Friday 22 Nov 2024 Abu Dhabi UAE
Prayer Timing
Today's Edition
Today's Edition
UAE

Abu Dhabi Federal Appeals Court adjourns case of terrorist 'Justice and Dignity Committee' Organisation to March 14 to complete hearing defence pleas

Abu Dhabi Federal Appeals Court adjourns case of terrorist 'Justice and Dignity Committee' Organisation to March 14 to complete hearing defence pleas
8 Mar 2024 15:12

ABU DHABI (WAM)


The State Security Chamber of the Abu Dhabi Federal Appeals Court has adjourned the hearing in Case No. 87 of 2023 - State Security Offences, involving the terrorist ‘Justice and Dignity Committee’ Organisation to March 14, 2024, in order to complete hearing pleas of the defence.

Eighty-four defendants stand accused in this case of establishing and managing a clandestine terrorist organisation in the UAE known as the ‘Justice and Dignity Committee’. The charges against them include planning terrorist acts, fundraising for the Organisation, and concealing the source and destination of those funds.

In yesterday's session, attended by the defendants' families and media representatives, the court heard over five hours of defence arguments. The lawyers for the accused challenged the validity of the charges presented by the Prosecution and contested the evidence submitted.

They demanded the acquittal and release of their clients.

The court adjourned the case until coming Thursday to allow for the completion of the defence presentation.

According to case details, the defence argued during the session that the court lacked jurisdiction due to a prior judgment in a previous case. The Prosecution, however, refuted this claim in its plea during a previous court session.

Additionally, the defence challenged the evidence presented, including the investigations and technical and financial reports. They argued that these reports relied heavily on analysis, leaving room for doubt and uncertainty.

The Prosecution concluded its arguments across two sessions in February.

They emphasised that this case is distinct from Case No. 79 of 2012 State Security Crimes and is not a retrial. The Prosecution based this on evidence presented in open court, including confessions and statements from the defendants that aligned with the State Security Agency's investigations, expert witness testimonies, and reports analysing the defendants' activities.

Copyrights reserved to Aletihad News Center © 2024